シンプルスモーカー ミニ 紹介ページ
新軽量設計!たったの10g!小さくて吸い易い”Mini”タイプが登場!
●なんと今なら、発売記念セットとして、「持ち運びケース」「持ち運びポーチ」もついてる!
●”節煙・禁煙にチャレンジしたい”方にも最適な電子タバコです。
●テレビや雑誌で大人気!空前のブームが巻き起こっています!
●工場と交渉を重ねて、業界最安値級の価格を実現しました。
●(財)日本食品分析センターの検査によって、メーカー規定の安全基準をクリアしております。
※なお、本製品にはニコチン、タールは一切含まれておりません。
電子タバコ 注意事項
注意事項
・パッケージ開封時はバッテリー充電が十分ではありません。十分に充電して本商品をお楽しみください。
・ゆっくり深く吸い込むことで、より多くの水蒸気が出ます。
・煙の量が少ない場合は、充電していただくか、カートリッジを交換してご使用ください。
・カートリッジを強く噛むと、キャップ取れたり、カバーが割れる恐れがございますのでご注意ください。
・電車の中や病院など、社会通念上喫煙が好まれない場所でのご使用はお控えください。
Posted: February 7th, 2010
at 3:01pm by admin
Tagged with 電子タバコ
Categories: 電子タバコ一覧
Comments: No comments
電子タバコ
電子タバコ
「Simple Smoker(シンプルスモーカー)」
スターターキット 本体+カートリッジ30本セット
【セット内容】
・Simple Smoker本体(バッテリーつき)・・・1個
・スペアバッテリー・・・1個
・USB充電器・・・1本
・電源アダプタ
・専用カートリッジ(ノーマル味)・・・15本
・専用カートリッジ(メンソール味)・・・15本
・取扱説明書(日本語)・・・1冊
(おまけ)
持ち運び用ポーチ・・・1個
【カートリッジ成分】
<メンソール>
■ プロピレングリコール PropyleneGlycol 91%
■ 水 Water、その他 9%
<ノーマル>
■ プロピレングリコール PropyleneGlycol 91%
■ 水 Water、その他 9%
【使用方法】
本体のバッテリーを十分充電した後、本体に接続しご利用ください。
【サイズ】
・本体サイズ:102mm×9.3mm
・Simple Smoker本体セット箱サイズ:縦115mm×横157mm×高さ32mm
【重量】 14.5g(バッテリー装着時)
Posted: February 7th, 2010
at 3:01pm by admin
Tagged with 電子タバコ
Categories: 電子タバコ
Comments: No comments
シンプルスモーカー 紹介ページ機能紹介・吸引時に空気が噴霧器を通過することにより、空気中の水分をミスト化させ、まるで本物の煙を吸っているような感覚を味わえます。
商品詳細
「シンプルだから低価格」
「シンプルだからエコ」日本でも新たなブームとなった電子タバコを、より手軽に皆様にお届けしたい。その想いから「Simple Smoker(シンプルスモーカー)」は生まれました。
生産している工場と何度も交渉を重ね、本当に必要とされるシンプルな機能に絞り込むことで、業界最安値級の低価格と業界最高級の品質を実現しました。
さらに、本体セットにはノーマル味15本、メンソール味15本のフィルターカートリッジが付いてくるので、このセットだけで約1ヶ月間お楽しみいただけます。 ※1日、1カートリッジを消費した場合
「Simple Smoker(シンプルスモーカー)」
”節煙・禁煙にチャレンジしたい”という方のスターターキットとしても、最適です。
※この商品は、(財)日本食品分析センターの検査によって、メーカー規定の安全基準をクリアしております。
Hustle-free purchasing of your anti-smoking program
According to Electroniccigarette123.com, finally a decision has been made about whether or not the FDA has the power to ban electronic cigarettes in the United States. As it turns out, the ruling was that they do not. This means that now it will be much easier for e cigarette distributors to be able to get their products and perhaps more regularly as well you are likely to see fewer shortages when it comes to ordering the e cigarette starter kits and accessories of your choice. If your distributor has had troubles keeping your favorite products in stock, hopefully this will be a thing of the past.
There has been so much controversy ever since e cigarettes first came on the market. Actually, they have been on the market for quite a few years, but the very first ones did not work nearly as well and were not nearly as accepted as the ones that are made and marketed today. Now the resemblance and sensation similarity to a conventional tobacco cigarette that many smokers would never dream of going back to tobacco.
As revealed by www.electroniccigarette123.com, when the FDA first became involved with trying to get clear of regulate electronic cigarettes, it was supposedly because they were trying to claim that it was a drug delivery device that perhaps should only be prescribed by a doctor. Others in some organizations wanted to ban the product all together. What the court ruled was basically that because the nicotine liquid is derived from the tobacco plant and since tobacco cannot be outlawed and requires no prescription, that they could not ban e cigarettes or cause them to have to be prescribed by a doctor. Other nicotine stuffs such as patches and gum are still legal and require no prescription.
E Cigarette Users: Help Save The Electronic Cigarette In The UK
The FDA on Monday night asked a federal appeals court in Washington to immediately stay an order that prevented the agency from blocking electronic cigarettes from entering the country.
The FDA said it does have the authority to regulate some products containing nicotine as though they are drugs and devices, such as nicotine patches and nicotine lollipops. The agency said the judge was “quite wrong to believe that no injury would result from the use of these harmful and addictive products.”
The case is testing the reach of FDA’s regulatory powers, and the agency and public health advocates have said it could have severe public health implications.
In January, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon sided with electronic-cigarette makers Smoking Everywhere Inc. and NJoy in finding that the FDA has no authority to regulate the products and can’t stop them from entering the country. His opinion came with a preliminary injunction that allowed Smoking Everywhere and NJoy to continue importing their products into the country.
The FDA has seized shipments of electronic cigarettes, which contain nicotine and look and taste like cigarettes but don’t contain tar, amid concerns the products were being marketed as safer alternatives to traditional tobacco. The FDA asserted its power by saying the electronic cigarettes were essentially drugs or devices that were being imported without FDA approval. Regulating the products as drugs or devices means the companies would have to conduct extensive clinical safety testing and apply for formal FDA approval.
Smoking Everywhere and NJoy are trying to avoid that. The companies say their products are used for recreation and, unlike nicotine patches, aren’t used as smoking cessation aids.
Judge Leon’s decision was based on a Supreme Court case decided in 2000 called FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. In that case, the court decided that allowing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products to be marketed as drugs or devices would result in their being banned from the market.
The FDA said in its appeal that the Supreme Court decision doesn’t preclude the agency from regulating tobacco products as though they are drugs or devices. The FDA said Judge Leon also “mistakenly” concluded that electronic cigarettes could be regulated under new tobacco powers signed into law in 2009.
Posted: February 4th, 2010
at 7:05pm by admin
Tagged with E Cigarette
Categories: 電子タバコ
Comments: No comments
In January, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon sided
WASHINGTON—The Food and Drug Administration is appealing a federal judge’s ruling that the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate electronic cigarettes.
The FDA on Monday night asked a federal appeals court in Washington to immediately stay an order that prevented the agency from blocking electronic cigarettes from entering the country.
The FDA said it does have the authority to regulate some products containing nicotine as though they are drugs and devices, such as nicotine patches and nicotine lollipops. The agency said the judge was “quite wrong to believe that no injury would result from the use of these harmful and addictive products.”
The case is testing the reach of FDA’s regulatory powers, and the agency and public health advocates have said it could have severe public health implications.
In January, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon sided with electronic-cigarette makers Smoking Everywhere Inc. and NJoy in finding that the FDA has no authority to regulate the products and can’t stop them from entering the country. His opinion came with a preliminary injunction that allowed Smoking Everywhere and NJoy to continue importing their products into the country.
Electronic cigarette imports on hold [Richmond Times-Dispatch, Va.]
Feb. 3–A federal appeals court has put on hold a lower court ruling allowing electronic cigarettes to be imported.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit stayed a lower court order banning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from seizing the devices when they enter the country.
Electronic cigarettes, also known as “e-cigarettes,” are devices that heat and vaporize small amounts of nicotine, the addictive substance in tobacco. They contain no tobacco, however.
The FDA had seized shipments of e-cigarettes beginning in 2008 as illegal drug-delivery devices.
The importers, Smoking Everywhere Inc. and Sottera Inc., had argued that the FDA lacked the authority to do so because of a 2000 Supreme Court ruling that the FDA lacked the power to regulate cigarettes and tobacco as drugs or devices.
The lower court judge, Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District Court in Washington, granted a preliminary injunction last month barring the FDA from stopping e-cigarette imports.
Leon said he did not see an immediate threat to public health from the e-cigarettes.
In appealing Leon’s injunction, the FDA noted that nicotine is addictive and toxic.
The agency also said that last year’s federal law giving it the power to regulate tobacco products did not prevent it from regulating drug devices that deliver nicotine.
A panel of three appeals court judges temporarily stayed the lower court ruling in order to give them more time to consider the FDA’s arguments that it should overturn Leon’s injunction.
Judge Orders F.D.A. to Stop Blocking Imports of E-Cigarettes From China
Judge Richard J. Leon of Federal District Court in Washington issued a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit brought by two distributors of the so-called e-cigarettes, which are battery-powered tubes that heat liquid nicotine into an inhalable vapor and are meant to simulate the taste of tobacco.
The distributors say the vapor contains virtually none of the cancer-causing chemicals of traditional cigarettes, but the F.D.A. says it has not been proved safe.
“This case appears to be yet another example of F.D.A.’s aggressive efforts to regulate recreational tobacco products as drugs or devices,” Judge Leon wrote.
With the passage of landmark tobacco legislation last year, he added, the Food and Drug Administration’s new tobacco division will be able to regulate the contents and marketing claims of e-cigarettes in the same way it is about to begin regulating traditional tobacco products. But the agency’s drug division cannot ban the devices, the judge ruled.
The Food and Drug Administration issued a brief statement: “The public health issues surrounding electronic cigarettes are of serious concern to the F.D.A. The agency is reviewing Judge Leon’s opinion and will decide the appropriate action to take.”
Representatives of the FDA weren't immediately available for comment.
Representatives of the FDA weren't immediately available for comment.
The FDA has seized shipments of electronic cigarettes, which look and taste like cigarettes but don't contain tar, amid concerns the products were being marketed as safer alternatives to traditional tobacco. The FDA asserted its power by saying the electronic cigarettes were essentially drugs or devices that were being imported without FDA approval.
Electronic cigarettes are battery-powered tubes that contain an atomizer, a battery and a cartridge filled with liquid nicotine. Florida-based Smoking Everywhere, one of the largest makers of electronic cigarettes, had challenged the FDA's authority to regulate the products. The company has imported and sold more than 600,000 units of electronic cigarettes, according to the judge's opinion.
Ray Story, a vice president for the company, said the opinion is a “big big big victory for us.” He said when in 2008 the FDA stopped shipments of the products into the U.S. it put a “damper” on the company's business.
Smoking Everywhere has sold about one million of the cigarettes in the U.S., he said. He declined to provide a dollar amount for the sales, saying the company was in the process of compiling figures.
Electronic cigarettes are facing challenges from attorneys general in California and New Jersey amid reports from the FDA that the products contain cancer-causing chemicals. Story said that electronic cigarettes are “less harmful” than traditional cigarettes. The products don't contain tar and don't produce smoke.
The opinion comes a week after a district-court judge in Kentucky largely ruled in favor of the FDA by saying the agency can restrict tobacco advertising. In that case, tobacco giants such as Reynolds American Inc. (RAI) and Lorillard Inc. (LO) said the FDA restrictions on tobacco ads infringes on their First Amendment rights.
-By Jared A. Favole, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9207; jared.favole@dowjones.com



